Objectives and Methods of Argumentative ResearchArgumentative research means an approach to a specific subject, where the aim is to generate highly subjective analyses, representations, and inferences. Such an approach is used as a source of creative problem solving. Argumentative research can be applied to large scale or small scale projects in different types of institutions like government agencies, educational institutions, commercial firms, or research laboratories.
In all types of research projects, the object of argumentative research is to arrive at desired results. The aim of argumentative research is to make a comprehensive study of a specific topic areas. This research is aimed at understanding the subject by applying different methods and techniques of research, as well as all other research methodologies in order to arrive at a very broad range of data that can be effectively used in building a better understanding of the topic areas. A discussion on the needs and opportunities for argumentative research can be found in this article.
With the changing trends in research methodology, the traditional discipline-based models are being replaced by quantitative models and processes. New models are providing an alternate framework for conducting scientific inquiry which entails a set of scientific strategies and tools that have been scientifically established. Consequently, the requirement for argumentative research has become much higher than in the past. It is very important to keep in mind that quantitative methods and frameworks may not be suitable for all types of inquiry.
The major focus of argumentative research is the combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches in order to give high quality and detailed data. Arguments made by the researcher in support of their arguments is of critical importance. The systematic analysis of different kinds of evidence can provide good evidence in support of the case or the hypothesis of the research. However, different types of evidence may be in a different perspective with regard to the issue under consideration.
In addition, the data obtained through qualitative analytical methods should also be critically analyzed and evaluated by the researcher. It is the qualitative analyses which help in assessing the strength of the arguments and research findings. Arguments of argumentative research and the evidences provided by them are extremely critical in order to provide the necessary direction for advancing scientific knowledge. Hence, it is very important to make sure that the research findings are genuinely supported by the given evidence.
The process of argumentative research also facilitates in facilitating the critical decision making of the research teams. The combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis helps in ensuring that the initial hypotheses are tested through various stages of research. As the research goes on, it is observed that new findings become increasingly more relevant. With such an approach, the researcher can eventually prove the validity of the argument by analyzing and evaluating it more thoroughly.
An argumentative research methodology also allows the interaction of knowledge from different fields to form a broader knowledge base, which further includes empirical data from different institutions of science. While the argumentative research methodology offers an alternative route to research, it is also subject to various drawbacks. These include the fact that the researcher must be able to prioritize the need for and benefit of each argument, which is an important aspect in argumentative research methodology.
In addition, argumentative research methodology requires the support of a number of persons in order to come up with definite research objectives and research strategies. In order to ensure that each of the arguments in the argumentative research are able to be properly tested, the research team must be capable of writing the appropriate descriptions and evidence of each argument. The absence of appropriate descriptions can lead to certain biases and erroneous interpretations of the argument.